{"id":158,"date":"2007-02-19T13:44:03","date_gmt":"2007-02-19T18:44:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sportsblogs.uscho.com\/d_i_womens_hockey_blog\/2007\/02\/19\/ncaa-selection-discussion-21907\/"},"modified":"2007-02-19T13:44:03","modified_gmt":"2007-02-19T18:44:03","slug":"ncaa-selection-discussion-21907","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2007\/02\/19\/ncaa-selection-discussion-21907\/","title":{"rendered":"NCAA Selection discussion, 2\/19\/07"},"content":{"rendered":"

Much has changed since my last NCAA Selection discussion two weeks ago.<\/font>The biggest development — there is now a gap between the top eight teams and everyone else.<\/p>\n

Minnesota, a top eight team for most of the season, is now in the same situation as Princeton, Ohio State, UConn — the Gophers have to win their conference tournament to get in (Note: Princeton could still beat out BC for at-large berth if Princeton won out and lost in the ECACHL final, and BC lost out).<\/p>\n

That of course, doesn’t mean those eight teams can rest easy. Automatic bid winners outside of the top eight could knock out up to three teams in the top eight. So Harvard, Boston College, and Minnesota-Duluth still have plenty at stake in the next two weeks. The end of this post will focus on the comparison between these teams. The BC-UMD comparison is worth the most discussion because that may decide the final at-large berth if there is just one autobid surprise.<\/p>\n

The current bracket projection is<\/p>\n