{"id":25747,"date":"2003-04-11T16:48:44","date_gmt":"2003-04-11T21:48:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2003\/04\/11\/town-hall-meeting-sparks-lively-debate\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:55:27","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:55:27","slug":"town-hall-meeting-sparks-lively-debate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2003\/04\/11\/town-hall-meeting-sparks-lively-debate\/","title":{"rendered":"Town Hall Meeting Sparks Lively Debate"},"content":{"rendered":"
On the eve of the final game of the season, college hockey fans received an opportunity to discuss championship issues, including the controversial seedings for this year’s tournament, at the third annual USCHO.com Town Hall Meeting.<\/p>\n
In the Grand Ballroom at the Hyatt Regency Hotel, fans queued up to ask selection committee members Ian McCaw — the committee chair — Ron Grahame and Wayne Dean, as well as NCAA director of championships Tom Jacobs, whatever was on their minds concerning the newly-expanded 16-team tournament. Resembling the banter seen on USCHO’s message board, questioners were partisan, colorful, insightful, and persistent, often following up the panel’s answers with further remarks.<\/p>\n
“There are no more loyal fans than those of college hockey,” Jacobs said after the event’s conclusion.<\/p>\n
The first thing on several fans’ minds was the seedings, especially the scenario that sent Colorado College to Michigan’s home ice for the regional, where it lost to the host school.<\/p>\n