{"id":25921,"date":"2003-09-29T15:44:27","date_gmt":"2003-09-29T20:44:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2003\/09\/29\/200304-st-cloud-state-season-preview\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:55:30","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:55:30","slug":"200304-st-cloud-state-season-preview","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2003\/09\/29\/200304-st-cloud-state-season-preview\/","title":{"rendered":"2003-04 St. Cloud State Season Preview"},"content":{"rendered":"
The cyclical nature of mid-major college hockey programs might be coming around to disrupt St. Cloud State’s standing as one of the recent fixtures in the NCAA tournament.<\/p>\n
Only Michigan and Maine have longer current streaks in the NCAA field, but the Huskies’ four-year run is in danger unless they can:<\/p>\n
Coach Craig Dahl put the dreaded “rebuilding phase” tag on his team, but it’s unclear how long that phase is expected to last. The Huskies are expecting to have some bumps right out of the gate this season, but will they be able to come around in time to make a run at the national tournament?<\/p>\n
Or will this be the start of a longer stretch of sub-par seasons for St. Cloud?<\/p>\n
“At a place like St. Cloud, much like many other places — unless you’re a Big Ten school or something like that — it seems like everybody’s a little cyclical,” Dahl said. “Even Boston University and Boston College and North Dakota. It’s kind of the lay of the land, so to speak. But certainly it’s going to be something we’re not going to be used to, if it indeed turns out that way.”<\/p>\n
At its worst, this Huskies team could have no one to lead the offense, an erratic defense and many nights of inconsistent play. The season outlook may appear dour — and it may be — but it could turn around on a few key names.<\/p>\n
It’s going to have to start on offense, where last season a number of players didn’t live up to the expectations they set for themselves in the 2001-02 season. Peter Szabo dipped from 32 points in his freshman season. The same can be said for Mike Doyle — 32 points to 21. <\/p>\n
That was one of the areas pointed out in explaining last season’s shortfall, and it’s a hot topic this season. Will they get back to the numbers they put up two seasons ago? Better still, can the Huskies survive if they don’t?<\/p>\n