It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology — College Hockey Style. It’s our weekly look at how the NCAA tournament would wind up if the season ended today.<\/p>\n
It’s a look into the possible thought processes behind selecting and seeding the NCAA tournament.<\/p>\n
This is the next installment of Bracketology, and we’ll be bringing you a new one every week until we make our final picks before the field is announced.<\/p>\n
Here are the facts:<\/p>\n
\u2022 Sixteen teams are selected to participate in the national tournament. <\/p>\n
\u2022 There are four regional sites (East — Rochester, N.Y., Northeast — Manchester, N.H., Midwest — Grand Rapids, Mich., West — Denver, Colo.)<\/p>\n
\u2022 A host institution which is invited to the tournament plays in the regional for which it is the host, and cannot be moved. There are three host institutions this year, New Hampshire in Manchester, Western Michigan in Grand Rapids, and Denver in Denver.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Seedings will not be switched, as opposed to years past. To avoid undesirable first-round matchups, including intraconference games (see below), teams will be moved among regionals, not reseeded.<\/p>\n
Here are the NCAA’s guidelines on the matter, per a meeting of the Championship Committee: <\/p>\n
In setting up the tournament, the committee begins with a list of priorities to ensure a successful tournament on all fronts including competitive equity, financial success and likelihood of playoff-type atmosphere at each regional site. For the model, the following is a basic set of priorities: <\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\u2022 The top four teams as ranked by the committee are the four No. 1 seeds and will be placed in the bracket so that if all four teams advance to the Men’s Frozen Four, the No. 1 seed will play the No. 4 seed and the No. 2 seed will play the No. 3 seed in the semifinals. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Host institutions that qualify will be placed at home. <\/p>\n
\u2022 No. 1 seeds are placed as close to home as possible in order of their ranking 1-4. <\/p>\n
\u2022 Conference matchups in first round are avoided, unless five or more teams from one conference are selected, then the integrity of the bracket will be preserved.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Once the six automatic qualifiers and 10 at-large teams are selected, the next step is to develop four groups from the committee’s ranking of 1-16. The top four teams are the No. 1 seeds. The next four are targeted as No. 2 seeds. The next four are No. 3 seeds and the last four are No. 4 seeds. These groupings will be referred to as “bands.”<\/p>\n
Additionally, the NCAA includes a bonus factor for “good” nonconference road wins and throws out “bad” wins, i.e. those wins that lower your RPI. The NCAA also will only use the Teams Under Consideration criterion if that team has played at least 10 games against TUCs.<\/p>\n
Because of this bonus factor, we won’t even talk about our PairWise Rankings (PWR) without an added bonus. We know that the bonus is at least .003 for a quality road win, so everything we talk about will use this number already factored in.<\/p>\n
Given these facts, here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR), with the bonus and the conference leaders (through all games of January 23, 2007): <\/p>\n
1 New Hampshire
\n2 Minnesota
\n3 St. Cloud
\n4 Notre Dame
\n5 Denver
\n6 Clarkson
\n7 Maine
\n8 Michigan State
\n9 Vermont
\n10t Michigan
\n10t Colorado College
\n12t Miami
\n12t Boston College
\n14 Boston University
\n15 North Dakota
\n16 Niagara
\n22 St. Lawrence
\n— Sacred Heart<\/p>\nCurrent conference leaders:<\/p>\n
Atlantic Hockey: RIT (served by Sacred Heart)
\nCHA: Niagara
\nCCHA: Notre Dame
\nECACHL : St. Lawrence
\nHockey East : New Hampshire
\nWCHA: Minnesota<\/p>\nNOTES<\/h4>\n
\u2022 Bracketology assumes that the season has ended and there are no more games to be played, i.e.<\/i>, the NCAA tournament starts tomorrow.<\/p>\n
\u2022 Because there are an uneven number of games played inside each conference, I will be using winning percentage, not points accumulated, to determine who the current leader in each conference is. This team is my assumed conference tournament champion.<\/p>\n
\u2022 RIT is ineligible for the NCAA tournament, therefore the next highest team in Atlantic Hockey gets the automatic bid per my criteria stated above. That team is Sacred Heart.<\/p>\n
Step One<\/b> <\/p>\n
From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament. <\/p>\n
We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the tied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the Top 16. Those teams are St. Lawrence, Niagara and Sacred Heart.<\/p>\n
From there, we can start looking at the bubble in a more detailed fashion.<\/p>\n
The bubbles consist of Michigan and Colorado College, tied for 10th, and Miami and BC, tied for 12th.<\/p>\n
Because St. Lawrence and Sacred Heart will take spots 15-16, Boston University and North Dakota are left out.<\/p>\n
Looking at the head-to-head PairWise comparisons it shows that Michigan defeats CC and Miami defeats BC.<\/p>\n
Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:<\/p>\n
1 New Hampshire
\n2 Minnesota
\n3 St. Cloud
\n4 Notre Dame
\n5 Denver
\n6 Clarkson
\n7 Maine
\n8 Michigan State
\n9 Vermont
\n10 Michigan
\n11 Colorado College
\n12 Miami
\n13 Boston College
\n14 Niagara
\n15 St. Lawrence
\n16 Sacred Heart <\/p>\nStep Two<\/b><\/p>\n
Now it’s time to assign the seeds.<\/p>\n
No. 1 Seeds – New Hampshire, Minnesota, St. Cloud, Notre Dame
\nNo. 2 Seeds – Denver, Clarkson, Maine, Michigan State
\nNo. 3 Seeds – Vermont, Michigan, Colorado College, Miami
\nNo. 4 Seeds – Boston College, Niagara, St. Lawrence, Sacred Heart<\/p>\nStep Three<\/b> <\/p>\n
Because of the fact that New Hampshire is hosting a regional, the Wildcats are placed first. We then place the other No. 1 seeds based on proximity to the regional sites. <\/p>\n
No. 1 New Hampshire is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
\nNo. 2 Minnesota is placed in the Midwest Regional in Grand Rapids.
\nNo. 3 St. Cloud is placed in the West Regional in Denver.
\nNo. 4 Notre Dame is placed in the East Regional in Rochester.<\/p>\nStep Four<\/b> <\/p>\n
Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intraconference matchups if possible. <\/p>\n
Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not<\/i> assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional). <\/p>\n
If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 v. No. 8, No. 2 v. No. 7, No. 3 v. No. 6 and No. 4 v. No. 5.<\/p>\n
So therefore:<\/p>\n
No. 2 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
No. 5 Denver is placed in No. 3 St. Cloud’s Regional, the West Regional, since Denver is a host institution.
\nNo. 6 Clarkson is placed in No. 4 Notre Dame’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 7 Maine is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 8 Michigan State is placed in No. 1 New Hampshire’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.<\/p>\nNo. 3 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
Our bracketing system has one Regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.<\/p>\n
Therefore:<\/p>\n
No. 9 Vermont is placed in No. 8 Michigan State’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 10 Michigan is placed in No. 7 Maine’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 11 Colorado College is placed in No. 6 Clarkson’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 12 Miami is placed in No. 5 Denver’s Regional, the West Regional.<\/p>\nNo. 4 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n
One more time, taking No. 16 v. No. 1, No. 15 v. No. 2, etc.<\/p>\n
No. 16 Sacred Heart is sent to New Hampshire’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 15 St. Lawrence is sent to Minnesota’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 14 Niagara is sent to St. Cloud’s Regional, the West Regional.
\nNo. 13 Boston College is sent to Notre Dame’s Regional, the East Regional.<\/p>\nThe brackets as we have set them up:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. St. Cloud
\nMiami vs. Denver<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
St. Lawrence vs. Minnesota
\nMichigan vs. Maine<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Boston College vs. Notre Dame
\nColorado College vs. Clarkson<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
Sacred Heart vs. New Hampshire
\nVermont vs. Michigan State<\/p>\nOur first concern is avoiding intraconference matchups. We have none. So the tournament is fixed.<\/p>\n
Bracketing the Frozen Four, if all four number-one seeds advance, then the top overall seed plays the No. 4 overall, and No. 2 plays No. 3. Therefore, the winners of the West and Midwest Regionals face each other in one semifinal (St. Cloud and Minnesota’s brackets), while the winners of the Northeast and East Regionals (New Hampshire and Notre Dame’s brackets) play the other semifinal. <\/p>\n
Another Take<\/h4>\n
As you can see above, we almost have the perfect bracket. In an ideal world if you add up the seed numbers you should come to 34, e.g.<\/i>, take the East Bracket. UNH is 1, MSU is 8, Vermont is 9 and SHU is 16. Add up the seeds and you get 34.<\/p>\n
Can we get all four brackets to 34?<\/p>\n
Absolutely.<\/p>\n
Let’s also remember the one simple rule that I brought up last week:<\/p>\n
You can move teams within a band, but not out of them<\/i>.<\/p>\n
So, what if we started out differently?<\/p>\n
No. 1 New Hampshire is placed in the Northeast Regional in Manchester.
\nNo. 2 Minnesota is placed in the Midwest Regional in Grand Rapids.
\nNo. 3 St. Cloud is placed in the East Regional in Rochester.
\nNo. 4 Notre Dame is placed in the West Regional in Denver.<\/p>\nNo. 5 Denver is placed in No. 4 Notre Dame’s Regional, the West Regional, since Denver is a host institution.
\nNo. 6 Clarkson is placed in No. 3 St. Cloud’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 7 Maine is placed in No. 2 Minnesota’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 8 Michigan State is placed in No. 1 New Hampshire’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.<\/p>\nNo. 9 Vermont is placed in No. 8 Michigan State’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 10 Michigan is placed in No. 7 Maine’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 11 Colorado College is placed in No. 6 Clarkson’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 12 Miami is placed in No. 5 Denver’s Regional, the West Regional.<\/p>\nNo. 16 Sacred Heart is sent to New Hampshire’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.
\nNo. 15 St. Lawrence is sent to Minnesota’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 14 Niagara is sent to St. Cloud’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 13 Boston College is sent to Notre Dame’s Regional, the West Regional.<\/p>\nSo our new tournament would look like this:<\/p>\n
West Regional: <\/p>\n
Boston College vs. Notre Dame
\nMiami vs. Denver<\/p>\nMidwest Regional: <\/p>\n
St. Lawrence vs. Minnesota
\nMichigan vs. Maine<\/p>\nEast Regional: <\/p>\n
Niagara vs. St. Cloud
\nColorado College vs. Clarkson<\/p>\nNortheast Regional: <\/p>\n
Sacred Heart vs. New Hampshire
\nVermont vs. Michigan State<\/p>\nIn the words of St. Louis Blues President John Davidson, “Oh Baby!”<\/p>\n
Perfect bracket. No shuffling, no switching, each regional adds up to 34.<\/p>\n
Let’s look at attendance.<\/p>\n
In Denver you have Denver, Notre Dame, BC and Miami. Sounds like a winner to me.<\/p>\n
In Grand Rapids you have Minnesota, Maine and Michigan. Another winner.<\/p>\n
In Manchester you have UNH and Vermont. Great winner.<\/p>\n
In Rochester you have two New York teams, Clarkson and Niagara. Another winner.<\/p>\n
I don’t think you can get any better than this with the way the PWR has fallen out.<\/p>\n
To the dismay of the other teams, I say let’s start the tournament right now.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy’s Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-01-25T01:45:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2010-08-18T00:56:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/\",\"name\":\"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-01-25T01:45:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-08-18T00:56:55+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\"},\"description\":\"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"width\":1175,\"height\":763},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\",\"name\":\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"description\":\"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\",\"name\":\"Jayson Moy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jayson Moy\"},\"description\":\"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","og_description":"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866","og_site_name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/","article_published_time":"2007-01-25T01:45:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2010-08-18T00:56:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Jayson Moy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@USCHO","twitter_site":"@USCHO","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jayson Moy","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/","name":"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","datePublished":"2007-01-25T01:45:38+00:00","dateModified":"2010-08-18T00:56:55+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0"},"description":"Another week of games, another edition of Jayson Moy's Bracketology. Take a look at how the NCAA tournament stacks up as of today...","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","width":1175,"height":763},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2007\/01\/24\/bracketology-jan-24-2007\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bracketology: Jan. 24, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/","name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0","name":"Jayson Moy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jayson Moy"},"description":"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28866"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28866\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28866"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28866"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28866"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=28866"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}