{"id":29731,"date":"2008-03-04T21:20:30","date_gmt":"2008-03-05T03:20:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2008\/03\/04\/tuesday-morning-quarterback-march-4\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:57:11","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:57:11","slug":"tuesday-morning-quarterback-march-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2008\/03\/04\/tuesday-morning-quarterback-march-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Tuesday Morning Quarterback: March 4"},"content":{"rendered":"
Editor’s note: Tuesday’s original publication of this column referenced the .500-or-better provision in the 2008 NCAA Championship Handbook, which would have removed Minnesota Duluth from tournament consideration based on its sub-.500 record. That language has now been identified by the NCAA as a misprint.<\/i><\/p>\n
Scott:<\/b> Eight? Eight?<\/i> I know we usually start by talking about key games, but this is getting surreal. Eight WCHA teams in the top 14 of the PairWise Rankings. You know, Jim, I’m a West guy and a Minnesota resident, but this is making my pupils dilate. I do believe that by the numbers, the WCHA has had the best season of any of the six Division I conferences, but eight<\/i> teams, even if just for the moment? Now, lest any of our readers start hyperventilating, the conference won’t get eight teams into the NCAA tournament. Someone in the WCHA will lose a first-round playoff series and drop down, and some tournament champion will come out of nowhere to pick up an autobid, and so forth and so on. But still … eight<\/i>?<\/p>\n
Jim:<\/b> Do you want to kick my dog while you’re at it, Brownie? It’s depressing enough that the East will struggle to win the national championship yet again. But with a possible eight WCHA teams and three, maybe four, CCHA teams in the mix, you might as well call this the Western College Hockey National Championship. I understand that the WCHA is having a decent year. And that the league, because of that, has a strong schedule for every single team. But it seems like this is almost no longer a national tournament. A lot of this has to do with the changes over the past five or six years in the tournament criteria. The rebalance of the RPI, the elimination of the “last 10” or “last 16” criteria. All of these edits have played towards the WCHA. In fact, it would play well towards any league in which the out-of-conference record is extremely solid and no one team runs away in league play. I understand that the criteria are what they are. But doesn’t this all seem a little unbalanced to you?<\/p>\n