{"id":30348,"date":"2009-02-20T21:17:41","date_gmt":"2009-02-21T03:17:41","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2009\/02\/20\/this-week-in-the-nchamcha\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:57:23","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:57:23","slug":"this-week-in-the-nchamcha","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2009\/02\/20\/this-week-in-the-nchamcha\/","title":{"rendered":"This Week in the NCHA\/MCHA"},"content":{"rendered":"
The pieces of the jigsaw puzzle are finally falling into place.<\/p>\n
Last week\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s action solidified playoff positions in the NCHA and MCHA, and the end result is a host of interesting first round match-ups in both leagues.<\/p>\n
In the NCHA, nothing is more intriguing than the 4\/5 tilt between the University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point and St. Norbert. It has been 11 years since the two rivals met in a two game playoff series.<\/p>\n
Also of note is the 2\/7 series between St. Scholastica and UW-River Falls. This is the third straight year the two will meet in the NCHA playoffs, but the first time St. Scholastica will host.<\/p>\n
Headlining the MCHA is the 4\/5 clash between Marian and Finlandia. This marks the fifth straight season the Sabres and Lions will be meeting in the league playoffs.<\/p>\n
With the playoffs in both leagues all squared away, this week also welcomed a healthy dose of clarity when it comes to the NCAA prospects of West Region teams. The first public edition of the NCAA Regional Rankings was released on Tuesday and it looked like this:<\/p>\n
1. Superior
\n2. St. Scholastica
\n3. Stout
\n4. St. Norbert
\n5. St. Olaf
\n6. Gustavus Adolphus
\n7. St. Thomas<\/p>\n
Of course, the biggest story to come of this is the noticeable absence of Adrian. The Bulldogs stand at 19-0-0 in the West Region and 23-1-1 overall, so how is it possible they aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t ranked?<\/p>\n
To steal a phrase from the D-I folks, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s \u00e2\u20ac\u0153simple math\u00e2\u20ac\u009d.<\/p>\n
The committee interpreted the criteria as it is supposed to, and when all was said and done the Bulldogs were not worthy of a top seven ranking.<\/p>\n
I find it unfortunate, as based on its play on the ice I believe Adrian is one of the top seven teams in the region. Where they fall in that top seven is certainly open to dispute, but if there was a way to play it off, I firmly believe they would prove themselves as one of the top Western teams.<\/p>\n
What this situation illustrates is an important flaw in the system. I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t know how to improve upon what we have, but within the current system there is no definitive way to account for the possibility a team like Adrian might actually be pushing the boundaries of the elite.<\/p>\n
Nonetheless, the committee should be commended for interpreting the criteria per the rules. This is actually contrary to last season as the Bulldogs were ranked fourth and fifth in the region despite not having the numbers to justify that ranking.<\/p>\n
As I said, this is an unfortunate reality of the Division III selection process, but it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s highly preferable to have the committee do it by the book, which is exactly what they did. That way, the onus for any incongruence is not on the committee itself but rather on the system they must work within.<\/p>\n
Otherwise, subjectivity comes into play. Though in this case it might have landed Adrian closer to where I and many others suspect it really ranks, it opens the door for the committee to do whatever it pleases and that is a road no one wants or needs to go down. They tried that two years ago and it went over like a lead balloon.<\/p>\n
Yet again, an unfortunate reality, but we must all admit the good with the bad. This time, the committee played it straight and should be commended for doing so. As disappointing as it is for Adrian\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s coaches, players, fans, and those of us who don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t possess a genetic predisposition against the Bulldogs\u00e2\u20ac\u00a6the committee got it right–according to the current numerical by-laws.<\/p>\n
The last time St. Norbert and Stevens Point met in a playoff series was–believe it or not–in 1998. In fact, they met in two playoff series that year, both of which both turned out to border on epic.<\/p>\n
The Green Knights hosted the Pointers in the Peters Cup Finals that season, and finally earned the conference crown with a goal near the end of overtime in the mini-game.<\/p>\n
The two met back in DePere, Wis. the following weekend in the quarterfinals of the NCAA tournament. That time the Pointers would enact revenge, scoring with less than a minute remaining in the mini-game to move on to the NCAA semifinals.<\/p>\n
To put into context how long ago that was, I was a freshman at UW-Stevens Point and that NCAA series was the one that hooked me on Division III hockey. Additionally, that season marked only the fifth<\/i> year behind the bench for Green Knights\u00e2\u20ac\u2122 head coach Tim Coghlin, while current Pointers head coach Wil Nichol actually partook in the game as a senior defenseman.<\/p>\n
Their only postseason meeting since then was in the 2003 Peters Cup semifinals where the Green Knights claimed a 3-1 win.<\/p>\n
From the fan\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s perspective, the renewal of this rivalry in the postseason is long overdue. But from a coach\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s standpoint, one doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t have to go back very far to quantify its significance.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not sure you need to look any further than back to the last game we played in Stevens Point,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Coghlin. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153They had a full house and a really great atmosphere and it was a 2-1 overtime game that went in their direction.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
Meanwhile, Pointers head coach Nichol attributes Stevens Point\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s lack of playoff familiarity with St. Norbert over the past decade to the success of St. Norbert more than anything else.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153If you look at the road St. Norbert has been on for the past 11 years, that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s something we would have liked to do,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153We would have liked to play them more because they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been in the Peters Cup finals most of those years. We haven\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t gotten it done in the playoffs, and that probably has something to do with it as well.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
One of the more surprising aspects to this series revolves around the fact that for a change the Green Knights do not enter as an overwhelming first round favorite. That is saying something considering the Green Knights have not dropped a quarterfinal series since 1997 and have played in every Peters Cup final since 2001.<\/p>\n
With a track record like that, being the fourth seed is something new to the Green Knights.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I\u00e2\u20ac\u2122m not overly surprised by it,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d explained Coghlin. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153The first thing we said at the beginning of the season was that this year would be different and it has been. If you look at every one of the one goal games that went our way last year, most have gone the other direction this year for whatever reason.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Our team has played very well, we really have. I am not disappointed with the guys in the locker room and I like what we have. Now, we certainly have not hit our stride yet and the question now is \u00e2\u20ac\u02dccan we?\u00e2\u20ac\u2122\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
At the same time, it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s interesting that Stevens Point moved up a spot in the NCHA this year and its reward is a trip to face the defending national champions.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153This is as good of an illustration as any as to how good our league is,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d said Nichol. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153They are defending national champions and they lose all of two players and they are in fourth place. They are as good as anybody we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve played this year–that\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s for sure.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
Coghlin elaborated on the impending weekend.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153You look at our two programs right now, and we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve descended down into the four spot and they\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve climbed up into the five, so we need to pay attention to where we go next or it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s not going to go well.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153We have to run the table; there is no two ways about it,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he concluded. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153But that puts us in the same boat as the majority of NCAA teams right now and we understand that.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
As far as recent history is concerned, St. Norbert and Stevens Point split their two meetings this season, each winning at home. <\/p>\n
In the early season meeting at St. Norbert, the Green Knights exploded late and turned a 2-1 game into a 5-2 runaway.<\/p>\n
Nichol explained: \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I think the first game we should have just bought tickets and sat in the stands because we were watching the whole time. The second game we were much more involved and not on our heels as much. We\u00e2\u20ac\u2122re going to get their best and we know that, so I think the difference is in how we are going to play.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
The Pointers were certainly more involved the second time around as they dropped the Green Knights in overtime last month, 2-1. <\/p>\n
Coghlin\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s thoughts on the two meetings this season are right in line with Nichol\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I do think we were better in the earlier game,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he said. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153Last time it was an entirely evenly game back and forth. Coming off that win, Stevens Point is a very dangerous team and we better stay focused on that.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
Though the \u00e2\u20ac\u0153dangerous\u00e2\u20ac\u009d label might be appropriate when applied to the Pointers, their track record at the Cornerstone Community Center is not a good one. Since its opening in 2000, the Pointers are a lackluster 1-7-2 at the CCC, and the win came all the way back in 2000.<\/p>\n
That said, the Pointers have played seven of their last 10 on the road, and Nichol hopes the road experience pays off this weekend.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153Our guys have been on the road so much over the second half I hope they are used to it and it won\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t be as big of an issue as it maybe was earlier in the year.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I think it\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s been a long time since we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve been over there this late in the year and I think we\u00e2\u20ac\u2122ve grown a lot as a team,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d he added. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153I don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t think being a visiting team this late in the year is going to affect our guys.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
Compared to years past, the Pointers might justifiably be a tad more confident heading into the CCC this weekend, but it certainly doesn\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t mean they aren\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t aware of what the Green Knights are capable of.<\/p>\n
\u00e2\u20ac\u0153I just think they are as well coached as anybody,\u00e2\u20ac\u009d explained Nichol. \u00e2\u20ac\u0153They are almost mechanical or robotic in their system. They don\u00e2\u20ac\u2122t lose games–you have to beat them, and that just goes along with my thoughts of Tim being one of the best coaches out there.\u00e2\u20ac\u009d<\/p>\n
To most observers, the Green Knights should nearly always be favored at home, and that is once again the case this weekend. Nichol pointed out, however, that last weekend\u00e2\u20ac\u2122s 5-4 come from behind victory over UW-Eau Claire was good preparation for this weekend, as the Blugolds are a very similar team to St. Norbert.<\/p>\n