{"id":31034,"date":"2010-02-17T13:57:19","date_gmt":"2010-02-17T19:57:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/"},"modified":"2010-08-17T19:57:53","modified_gmt":"2010-08-18T00:57:53","slug":"bracketology-feb-17-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/","title":{"rendered":"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"

It’s time once again to do what we like to call Bracketology — college hockey style. It’s our weekly look at how I believe the NCAA Ice Hockey Championship Committee will use the PairWise to determine the NCAA Tournament bracket. <\/p>\n

If you’re new to Bracketology, click here for the background<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Here is the top 16 of the current PairWise Rankings (PWR)<\/a>, and the conference leaders (through all games of Feb. 16): <\/p>\n

1 Miami
\n2 Denver
\n3 Wisconsin
\n4t St. Cloud State
\n4t Bemidji State
\n4t Boston College
\n7 Colorado College
\n8 Yale
\n9t Minnesota-Duluth
\n9t Cornell
\n9t New Hampshire
\n9t Vermont
\n13t North Dakota
\n13t Michigan State
\n15 Massachusetts
\n16 Ferris State
\n— RIT<\/p>\n

Current conference leaders based on winning percentage:
\nAtlantic Hockey: RIT
\nCHA: Bemidji State
\nCCHA: Miami
\nECAC: Yale (wins head-to-head tiebreaker with Cornell)
\nHockey East: New Hampshire
\nWCHA: Denver<\/p>\n

Step One<\/h4>\n

From the committee’s report, choose the 16 teams in the tournament. <\/p>\n

We break ties in the PWR by looking at the individual comparisons among the
\ntied teams, and add in any current league leaders that are not currently in the top 16. The only team that is not is RIT.<\/p>\n

From there, we can start looking at the bubble in a more detailed fashion.<\/p>\n

The bubbles consist of St. Cloud, Bemidji and BC at 4; UMD, Cornell, UNH and UVM at 9; and North Dakota and MSU at 13.<\/p>\n

Looking at the head-to-head PairWise comparisons we break all of our ties. <\/p>\n

Therefore the 16 teams in the tournament, in rank order, are:<\/p>\n

1 Miami
\n2 Denver
\n3 Wisconsin
\n4 St. Cloud State
\n5 Bemidji State
\n6 Boston College
\n7 Colorado College
\n8 Yale
\n9 Minnesota-Duluth
\n10 Cornell
\n11 New Hampshire
\n12 Vermont
\n13 North Dakota
\n14 Michigan State
\n15 Massachusetts
\n16 RIT<\/p>\n

Step Two<\/h4>\n

Now it’s time to assign the seeds.<\/p>\n

No. 1 Seeds — Miami, Denver, Wisconsin, St. Cloud State
\nNo. 2 Seeds — Bemidji State, Boston College, Colorado College, Yale
\nNo. 3 Seeds — Minnesota-Duluth, Cornell, New Hampshire, Vermont
\nNo. 4 Seeds — North Dakota, Michigan State, Massachusetts, RIT<\/p>\n

Step Three<\/h4>\n

Place the No. 1 seeds in regionals. Following the guidelines, there are no
\nhost teams in this grouping, so that rule does not need to be enforced. <\/p>\n

We now place the other No. 1 seeds based on proximity to the regional sites. <\/p>\n

No. 1 Miami is placed in the Midwest Regional in Fort Wayne, Ind.
\nNo. 2 Denver is placed in the West Regional in St. Paul, Minn.
\nNo. 3 Wisconsin is placed in the East Regional in Albany, N.Y.
\nNo. 4 St. Cloud State is placed in the Northeast Regional in Worcester, Mass.<\/p>\n

Step Four<\/h4>\n

Now we place the other 12 teams so as to avoid intra-conference matchups if possible. <\/p>\n

Begin by filling in each bracket by banding groups. Remember that teams are not<\/I><\/b> assigned to the regional closest to their campus sites by ranking order within the banding (unless you are a host school, in which case you must be assigned to your home regional). <\/p>\n

If this is the case, as it was last year, then the committee should seed so that the quarterfinals are seeded such that the four regional championships are played by No. 1 vs. No. 8, No. 2 vs. No. 7, No. 3 vs. No. 6 and No. 4 vs. No. 5.<\/p>\n

So therefore:<\/p>\n

No. 2 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n

No. 8 Yale is placed in No. 1 Miami’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 7 Colorado College is placed in No. 2 Denver’s Regional, the West Regional.
\nNo. 6 Boston College is placed in No. 3 Wisconsin’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 5 Bemidji State is placed in No. 4 St. Cloud’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.<\/p>\n

No. 3 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n

Our bracketing system has one Regional containing seeds 1, 8, 9, and 16, another with 2, 7, 10, 15, another with 3, 6, 11, 14 and another with 4, 5, 12 and 13.<\/p>\n

Therefore:<\/p>\n

No. 9 Minnesota-Duluth is placed in No. 8 Yale’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 10 Cornell is placed in No. 7 Colorado College’s Regional, the West Regional.
\nNo. 11 New Hampshire is placed in No. 6 Boston College’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 12 Vermont is placed in No. 5 Bemidji’s Regional, the Northeast Regional. <\/p>\n

No. 4 Seeds<\/i> <\/p>\n

One more time, taking No. 16 vs. No. 1, No. 15 vs. No. 2, etc. <\/p>\n

No. 16 RIT is sent to No. 1 Miami’s Regional, the Midwest Regional.
\nNo. 15 Massachusetts is sent to No. 2 Denver’s Regional, the West Regional.
\nNo. 14 Michigan State is sent to No. 3 Wisconsin’s Regional, the East Regional.
\nNo. 13 North Dakota is sent to No. 4 St. Cloud’s Regional, the Northeast Regional.<\/p>\n

The brackets as we have set them up:<\/p>\n

Northeast Regional: <\/p>\n

Vermont vs. Bemidji State
\nNorth Dakota vs. St. Cloud State<\/p>\n

Midwest Regional: <\/p>\n

RIT vs. Miami
\nMinnesota-Duluth vs. Yale<\/p>\n

East Regional: <\/p>\n

Michigan State vs. Wisconsin
\nNew Hampshire vs. Boston College<\/p>\n

West Regional: <\/p>\n

Massachusetts vs. Denver
\nCornell vs. Colorado College<\/p>\n

Our first concern is avoiding intra-conference matchups. We have North Dakota vs. St. Cloud and New Hampshire vs. Boston College.<\/p>\n

The only place where North Dakota can go is to face Miami, since the other three No. 1 seeds are all WCHA teams. So we place North Dakota in that bracket. Then we switch RIT to the next highest seed, which is Denver. And we also adjust Michigan State and Massachusetts accordingly.<\/p>\n

Therefore, Michigan State will play St. Cloud and Massachusetts will play Wisconsin.<\/p>\n

Now we tackle New Hampshire. We can’t switch New Hampshire with Vermont, since that creates another Hockey East-Hockey East matchup. So we can switch with either Cornell or Minnesota-Duluth.<\/p>\n

We can’t switch with UMD because that creates a WCHA-WCHA matchup. So we switch UNH with Cornell.<\/p>\n

So our tournament now becomes:<\/p>\n

Northeast Regional: <\/p>\n

Vermont vs. Bemidji State
\nMichigan State vs. St. Cloud State<\/p>\n

Midwest Regional: <\/p>\n

North Dakota vs. Miami
\nMinnesota-Duluth vs. Yale<\/p>\n

East Regional: <\/p>\n

Massachusetts vs. Wisconsin
\nCornell vs. Boston College<\/p>\n

West Regional: <\/p>\n

RIT vs. Denver
\nNew Hampshire vs. Colorado College<\/p>\n

Do we like the way this looks?<\/p>\n

We have no intraconference matchups, so we are OK. Integrity also looks OK.<\/p>\n

Do we have an attendance issue?<\/p>\n

It looks great in Albany and pretty good in Fort Wayne.<\/p>\n

Worcester and St. Paul will be problems.<\/p>\n

Can we make it better? <\/p>\n

Looking at it, St. Cloud, Bemidji and Michigan State might be better off in St. Paul.<\/p>\n

So let’s switch the entire bracket geographies.<\/p>\n

Now what do we have?<\/p>\n

West Regional: <\/p>\n

Vermont vs. Bemidji State
\nMichigan State vs. St. Cloud State<\/p>\n

Midwest Regional: <\/p>\n

North Dakota vs. Miami
\nMinnesota-Duluth vs. Yale<\/p>\n

East Regional: <\/p>\n

Massachusetts vs. Wisconsin
\nCornell vs. Boston College<\/p>\n

Northeast Regional: <\/p>\n

RIT vs. Denver
\nNew Hampshire vs. Colorado College<\/p>\n

Let’s take a look.<\/p>\n

Much better.<\/p>\n

Can we make it any better?<\/p>\n

There is one possibility that you can consider here. Because we have a four-way tie in the third band (seedings 9-12), we can move those teams around at will basically, without affecting bracket integrity.<\/p>\n

Does this piece of information help us whatsoever?<\/p>\n

Maybe switching Minnesota-Duluth and Vermont will help to boost St. Paul’s attendance even more. This gives us three Minnesota teams in St. Paul.<\/p>\n

I am certainly for that. So I am going to make that switch.<\/p>\n

Our new brackets:<\/p>\n

West Regional: <\/p>\n

Minnesota-Duluth vs. Bemidji State
\nMichigan State vs. St. Cloud State<\/p>\n

Midwest Regional: <\/p>\n

North Dakota vs. Miami
\nVermont vs. Yale<\/p>\n

East Regional: <\/p>\n

Massachusetts vs. Wisconsin
\nCornell vs. Boston College<\/p>\n

Northeast Regional: <\/p>\n

RIT vs. Denver
\nNew Hampshire vs. Colorado College<\/p>\n

Now there is outstanding attendance in Albany and St. Paul. <\/p>\n

Worcester gets a boost from UNH and RIT.<\/p>\n

Fort Wayne gets a boost from Miami and North Dakota.<\/p>\n

So that’s where I’ll hang my hat this week.<\/p>\n

Check the Bracketology Blog<\/a> for other items and we’ll see you here next week for the next Bracketology.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":140328,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"coauthors":[],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nBracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-17T19:57:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2010-08-18T00:57:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@USCHO\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Jayson Moy\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/\",\"name\":\"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-17T19:57:19+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2010-08-18T00:57:53+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\"},\"description\":\"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg\",\"width\":1175,\"height\":763},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/\",\"name\":\"College Hockey | USCHO.com\",\"description\":\"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0\",\"name\":\"Jayson Moy\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Jayson Moy\"},\"description\":\"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","og_description":"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034","og_site_name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/OfficialUSCHO\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-17T19:57:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2010-08-18T00:57:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/03\/uscho_featured-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Jayson Moy","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@USCHO","twitter_site":"@USCHO","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Jayson Moy","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/","name":"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010 - College Hockey | USCHO.com","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","datePublished":"2010-02-17T19:57:19+00:00","dateModified":"2010-08-18T00:57:53+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0"},"description":"USCHO Bracketologist Jayson Moy has attendance on his mind and searches for a way to make the regionals a better draw as he breaks down what the NCAA tournament field might look like if it was selected today.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/uscho.jpg","width":1175,"height":763},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/2010\/02\/17\/bracketology-feb-17-2010\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bracketology: Feb. 17, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/","name":"College Hockey | USCHO.com","description":"Men's and Women's D-I and D-III College Hockey News, Features, Scores, Statistics, Fan Forum, Blogs","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5c2cea64cc964ec8368242f6397de9d0","name":"Jayson Moy","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/0844fd38a6823ecd776d66f78a8809cc","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/74ee8f7930ed5a3d4781a8ff3e4eb3f5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Jayson Moy"},"description":"Senior Writer Jayson Moy is a senior writer and has been with USCHO since its inception. He covered the ECAC from 1996 to 2003 and is the 2001 recipient of the ECAC Media Recognition Award. He has been writing Bracketology since 2004 and has never missed predicting the NCAA field.","url":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/author\/jayson\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/140328"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31034"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wp-admin.uscho.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/coauthors?post=31034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}