{"id":96663,"date":"2009-03-04T09:55:16","date_gmt":"2009-03-04T14:55:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.uscho.com\/blogs\/d-iii-blog\/chris\/20090304\/d-iii-bracketology-take-ii.html"},"modified":"2009-03-04T09:55:16","modified_gmt":"2009-03-04T14:55:16","slug":"d-iii-bracketology-take-ii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wwwproxy.uscho.com\/2009\/03\/04\/d-iii-bracketology-take-ii\/","title":{"rendered":"D-III Bracketology, Take II"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Crystal Ball got as little clearer thanks to last week’s results. The ECAC East was, ahem, interesting, with three of the top four seeds going down. That means someone other than Norwich (that would be New England College) will host the semifinals and final for the first time ever. The ECAC West also saw the top two seeds go under, as well regular season champ St. Olaf in the MIAC.<\/p>\n

To reset, we know the criteria<\/a> used by the NCAA Division III Men’s Committee to select and seed the teams, but not the weighting used in their evaluation. You can see what an equal weighting would look like using USCHO East<\/a>, West<\/a> and combined<\/a> Pairwise Comparisons.<\/p>\n

Each of the past three Tuesdays, the NCAA has produced rankings<\/a> based on the process it will use to select the Division III field.<\/p>\n

There are 11 teams invited: 6 Pool A teams, 1 Pool B Team, and 4 Pool C teams. Pool A consists of the six teams that will win playoff championships in leagues with an automatic qualifier: ECAC East, ECAC Northeast, NCHA, NESCAC, MIAC, and SUNYAC. A Pool B slot is reserved for an independent team or team from a conference that does not have an AQ: ECAC West and MCHA. Pool C bids will be handed out to the highest remaining teams according to the NCAA rankings.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s my guess as to where the teams still in the running stand:<\/p>\n

A lock<\/strong>: Plattsburgh, UW-Superior – These teams can at most lose one more game, and are comfortably ahead in the key criteria. They\u2019re in no matter what happens from here on out.<\/p>\n

Bet On It<\/strong>: UW-Stout, Amherst, Hobart – Hobart was elevated for its win over Manhattanville and Elmira smacked down for its loss to Neumann, more so that I thought it would. I thought based on the criteria that Elmira had Pool B wrapped up, but it now looks (based on the NCAA rankings) that Hobart will claim Pool B if it wins the ECAC West title on Saturday over Neumann. I think that Stout and Amherst can each survive a loss and still get a Pool C bid. They can both of course win their way in.<\/p>\n

Good Chance<\/strong>: St. Scholastica, Middlebury, Elmira – CSS should be in, unless there’s an 8-3 split. Middlebury can win its way in, otherwise it has to hope that Amherst, Plattsburgh and Hobart all win. Could Elmira and Hobart flip-flop for Pool B if Hobart loses? It would be close.<\/p>\n

On the Bubble<\/strong>: Neumann, St. Norbert, Manhattanville – It’s anyone’s guess (except the committee’s ) how high Neumann would jump with a win at Hobart. St. Norbert would get the nod in the event of a 6-5 split. Manhattanville has a remote chance should the top seeds win and there’s an 8-3 split.<\/p>\n

On the Outside<\/strong>: Wait till next year: Norwich, St. Olaf.<\/p>\n

Must Win Their AQ<\/strong>: Oswego, Williams, Trinity, New England, Nichols, Curry, Wentworth, Nichols, Fitchburg State, UMass-Boston, Babson, Skidmore, Hamline, Gustavus Adolphus.<\/p>\n

OK, so let\u2019s take a shot at a possible bracket, assuming the team in first wins its respective league:<\/p>\n

ECAC East: New England<\/p>\n

ECAC Northeast: Nichols<\/p>\n

MIAC: Gustavus Adolphus<\/p>\n

NCHA: UW-Superior<\/p>\n

NESCAC: Amherst<\/p>\n

SUNYAC: Plattsburgh<\/p>\n

Right now, Hobart gets pool B. Who gets the four Pool C bids? Right now the pool consists of: St. Scholastica, UW-Stout, Middlebury, Elmira, St. Norbert, Manhattanville. Things get really interesting if Neumann beats Hobart. They could jump into the mix. If Oswego doesn’t win the SUNYAC, I think the loss drops the Lakers out of Pool C contention.<\/p>\n

Now, the big question, which will help determine the Pool C teams: Will we have a 6-5 split with two play-in games in the East and one in the West, or a 7-4 split and give only the top East seed a bye (all play-in games in the East). You could also do a 7-4 split and fly a team in the first and second rounds. This would probably be fairer, but who thinks the NCAA will do that? On the other hand, is it fair to give St. Norbert a spot in the quarterfinals but make Amherst or whoever is the #2 eastern seed play-in? people out West are nodding their heads – they’ve been doing that for the past few seasons.<\/p>\n

An 8-3 split would leave either UW-Stout or St. Scholastica out in favor of Manhattanville. The Valiants lose in all criteria to CSS, but stack up more favorably with UW-Stout in the criteria, so I suppose a loss by the Blue Devils could open the door.<\/p>\n